Investors
generally look at the performance of the funds when investing in to mutual
funds, ignoring the dark truth about expense ratios, which can greatly impact
the returns over a longer period of time.
Investors generally lack the understanding of expense ratios and fail to
understand how the returns from the mutual funds can get greatly reduced due to
a high expense ratio.
This
article will help the investors to know how returns from a fund with a low
expense ratio can give better returns compared with the funds having a high
expense ratio.
But
before starting our quest let us first understand what expense ratio is all
about.
What is expense ratio?
Investing into the mutual funds is very easy compared
with other asset classes. They are managed by professional fund managers who
allocate and manage your money in volatile market situations. For providing
this service, the fund houses charge certain fees on an annual basis which is captured
as an expense ratio.
The expense ratio is what you have to pay the fund
house on a yearly basis. This charge is deducted from the value of the mutual
fund. It takes into account all the expenses that the fund incurs, including
management fee, administration and transaction costs, and marketing. Expense
ratios typically range from 0.3% to 2.5%. The lower the expense ratio, the
better it is for you, because you pay less.
Expense
ratio is charged from your investments made in mutual funds on a daily basis
before NAV is declared.
NAV
is the price at which investor buys or sells units of Mutual Fund. It is
derived by dividing the total assets (sum of total value of all securities and
cash) of the fund by the number of units issued to investors. The value of your
investment is driven not only by NAV but, it is a product of NAV and number of
units.
To
make it clearer, let me guide you through an example; suppose an investor has
invested INR 100,000 in a fund whose expense ratio is at 1%. Let us assume that
the mutual fund grew by 10% in a year, which turns out to be INR 10,000.
It
is quite natural for the investor to think that his/her investment value has
increased to 110,000, but that is not the case. The fund house will deduct the
expense ratio first before publishing the actual returns. Let us now see, how
much the investor has to pay as expense ratio and what will be his/her total
gain.
10%
percent increase of the amount will mean 100000+ 100000*10/100= 110000. Now we
have to pay 1% expense ratio on the amount. So this 1% is computed as follows
110000- 110000*1/100+ 1100.
So,
the final value of the investment would be 110000-1100=108900 which is 8.9%
increase and not 10%.
By
now, some of the investors have actually started to calculate how the expense
ratio will reduce the return of their hard earned money over the years, while
another set of investors must be thinking that it doesn’t matter to pay high
expense ratios as long as they get decent returns from their mutual fund
holdings.
If
the investor is investing for a time horizon of one to two years, then expense
ratio shouldn’t be a major cause of concern for them, but if the investor is
investing for a longer time frame then certainly it is bound to have a major
impact on their returns.
Impact of Expense Ratio
Let us now see how the expense
ratio can impact the mutual fund returns over a longer time frame.
For
the sake of simplicity we have taken three scenarios with three different
expense ratios; 1%, 1.5% and 2%. We will calculate the three different
scenarios and see how a lumpsum investment of INR 200,000 lacs will return
after 25 years taking into consideration that will return at an average rate of
10% every year.
Time Period (Year)
|
1% Expense Ratio
|
1.5% Expense Ratio
|
2% Expense Ratio
|
1
|
200000
|
200000
|
200000
|
2
|
217800
|
216700
|
215600
|
3
|
237184
|
234794
|
232416
|
4
|
258293
|
254399
|
250546
|
5
|
281281
|
275642
|
270088
|
6
|
306315
|
298658
|
291154
|
7
|
333577
|
323596
|
313864
|
8
|
363266
|
350616
|
338346
|
9
|
395597
|
379892
|
364736
|
10
|
430805
|
411613
|
393186
|
11
|
469146
|
445983
|
423856
|
12
|
510900
|
483223
|
456916
|
13
|
556371
|
523572
|
492556
|
14
|
605888
|
567290
|
530974
|
15
|
659812
|
614659
|
572390
|
16
|
718535
|
665983
|
617036
|
17
|
782458
|
721592
|
665165
|
18
|
852126
|
781845
|
717048
|
19
|
927965
|
847130
|
772978
|
20
|
1010554
|
917865
|
833270
|
21
|
1100493
|
994507
|
898266
|
22
|
1198437
|
1077548
|
968330
|
23
|
1305098
|
1167523
|
1043860
|
24
|
1421252
|
1265012
|
1125282
|
25
|
1547743
|
1370640
|
1213054
|
|
|
-177102
|
-334692
|
|
|
-11.44%
|
-21.62%
|
Table 1: Showing long term returns with various Expense
Ratios
This
simple example shows you that how a fund with higher expense ratio can lower
down the returns in the long run.
In
a longer term, you can see how the corpus value reached more than 15 lacs with
1% expense ratio, but if the expense ratio was 2%, then despite the same
performance, the corpus would be only reach to 12.1 lacs. That’s approximately
21.62% short from the fund which has 1% expense ratio.
This will
clearly act as an eye opener for investors that a fund with high expense ratio
can erode your returns, so one must take this important factor in to
consideration before investing in a mutual fund.
In the case
of debt funds, the impact of expense ratio is even more. Debt funds generally
generate 8-9% average returns so it will hurt to pay 2% expense ratio for 8-9%
average return for debt funds.
Scheme Name
|
Date
|
Expense Ratio
|
AIG India Equity-Reg(G)
|
31-Mar-2012
|
2.4100
|
Axis Equity Fund(G)
|
31-May-2012
|
2.5000
|
Axis Midcap(G)
|
31-May-2012
|
2.5000
|
Baroda Pioneer PSU
Equity(G)
|
31-Mar-2012
|
2.5000
|
Birla SL Equity(G)
|
31-Mar-2012
|
2.1500
|
BNP Paribas Equity
Fund(G)
|
31-May-2012
|
2.4500
|
DWS Alpha Equity(G)
|
30-Apr-2012
|
2.5000
|
Edelweiss Equity
Enhancer-B(G)
|
31-May-2012
|
2.4600
|
Fidelity Equity(G)
|
31-Mar-2012
|
1.8400
|
HDFC Top 200(G)
|
31-Mar-2012
|
1.7700
|
HSBC Midcap Equity(G)
|
31-Mar-2012
|
2.4600
|
IDFC Equity-A(G)
|
31-Mar-2012
|
2.3000
|
Reliance Equity-Ret(G)
|
31-Mar-2012
|
2.0200
|
My Recommended Funds
(Large Cap)
|
|
|
DSPBR Top 100
Equity-Reg(G)
|
30-Apr-2012
|
1.8400
|
ICICI Pru Focused Blue
Chip Equity-Ret(G)
|
31-Mar-2012
|
1.8300
|
Franklin India
Bluechip(G)
|
31-May-2012
|
1.8200
|
Source : ACE MF
|
|
|
Table 2: Showing the performance of different equity funds
As evident from the above table, my recommended large cap funds have
the least expense ratio when compared with the expense ratios of few of the
stalwart funds in the industry. Please note the above fund list comprises of
all equity funds which include large, multi and mid cap funds.
Conclusion
A
fund with high expense ratio will lower the returns in the long run. So when an
investor is choosing two similar performing funds, they should look at their
cost structure.
The dark
truth of expense ratio discussed in this article will give investors a holistic
view while comparing similar mutual funds with almost equal returns. So a fund
which delivers superior risk-adjusted returns and has lower expense ratio is a
better bet for your portfolio.